What criteria are used to review my validation?

The videos are reviewed demanding that it is ALWAYS FULFILLED:

  • The narrative is correctly sequenced. There is a common thread that gives meaning so that what is explained is based on the above.

  • All the key equations of each marked point are considered, showing it and explaining the context in which it is being used (which means, that it allows / we seek to calculate).

  • Explain the relevant parameters that are employed in the equation, whether they were estimated or come from another calculation in order to understand the logic of the calculation sequence.

  • The result obtained is discussed and as far as possible it is compared with typical values or some analogous value in the same case.

Enough that

  • any of these points is not considered in a systematic way or

  • there is some major error in the explanation

so that the validation is objected.


(ID-description:[email protected]©20180508)